March 7, 2026
Dear Commissioners White, Waters, and Morse,
On behalf of Laurel C.A.R.E.D. (Community Advocates for Responsible Economic Development), we are writing to formally request your participation in our upcoming community town hall meeting in Laurel, Montana.
Event Details:
Date: Monday, March 16, 2026
Time: 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM
Location: Laurel High School Auditorium, Laurel, Montana
We are writing to all three of you in a single communication intentionally. The questions our community has for Yellowstone County are questions for the Commission as a whole, and we are asking each of you to show up — in person, on the record — to engage with the residents you represent. We recognize that coordinating three schedules is not always simple, and we are flexible on format: you may participate together, divide topics among yourselves, or each engage independently. What we are asking for, from each of you, is a presence. The people of Laurel deserve to hear directly from their county leadership — not through intermediaries, not through written statements read in your absence, but face to face.
Why This Moment Matters
The residents of Yellowstone County are facing several significant issues simultaneously — a proposed forensic mental health corrections facility being placed in a residential community without meaningful public input, serious unresolved questions about the county jail and its future, and emerging concerns about infrastructure and resource demands on the horizon, specifically in connection with the proposed development of data centers in and around the region. None of these issues exist in isolation. Each one requires county leadership to ask the right questions, demand the right answers, and ensure that the people of this county are not left absorbing consequences they were never given the opportunity to weigh in on. We believe this town hall is an opportunity to begin that accounting — publicly, transparently, and on the record.
We also want to be clear: we are not only asking the Commission to answer to the community of Laurel. We are inviting you to be part of the conversation in a much larger sense. Governor Gianforte, Montana Board of Investments Executive Director Dan Villa, and DPHHS Director Charlie Brereton have all been formally invited to participate in a structured Q&A panel at this event. We welcome the Yellowstone County Commissioners to come prepared with their own direct questions for these officials — on behalf of every county resident whose wellbeing is affected by the decisions being made at the state level. This is an opportunity not only for the community of Laurel to get answers, but for county leadership to hold state leadership accountable in a public forum.
Topics & Community Questions
We recognize that scheduling may limit what can be covered in a single evening. To that end, we are asking the Commission to prioritize topics in the following order, and we encourage any materials that cannot be addressed in full during the event to be made available to the community in an accessible supplementary format — whether that is a PowerPoint presentation, a printed pamphlet or flyer, or a link to a written report that residents can access after the event. We want the community to leave with not just answers, but resources.
1. The Forensic Mental Health Corrections Facility
This is the primary focus of the town hall and the most urgent concern for the residents of Laurel.
Awareness and the County's Role in the Process
It is our understanding that one or more members of this Commission has explicitly opposed the placement of this facility in Yellowstone County. We want to understand what the Commission's involvement in this process has looked like from the beginning. Was the county informed at appropriate stages of planning and site selection, or does the Commission feel it was intentionally kept in the dark? Does the Commission have broader concerns about the level of responsibility being concentrated in Yellowstone County in connection with this project — and does the Commission feel that the county has been treated as a partner in this process, or as an afterthought?
Workforce and Staffing
We are asking the Commission to share any reports, data, or context available regarding the workforce landscape in Yellowstone County — particularly in Billings and Laurel. What does the current staffing situation look like at comparable correctional or forensic mental health facilities in Montana? Is the county realistically positioned to support a facility of this nature, or is it being asked to absorb a project that will strain an already limited labor pool?
Financial and Liability Exposure
What liability and financial responsibilities would Yellowstone County realistically bear in connection with this facility? Has the Commission conducted or commissioned any analysis of the county's long-term financial exposure? The public deserves a frank accounting of what this project could cost county taxpayers — not just at opening, but over time.
Communications with City of Laurel Officials
We are asking whether the Commission would be willing to comment on communications between the Yellowstone County Commissioner's Office and City of Laurel officials — including but not limited to Mayor Dave Waggoner and Chief Administrative Officer Kurt Markegard. There is a meaningful question before this community about whether city officials acted appropriately within the scope of their authority — particularly given that Yellowstone County and the City of Billings had already communicated concerns to the state prior to Laurel's formal involvement in this process. Does the Commission believe city leadership engaged with state agencies in a manner consistent with their roles and responsibilities? We welcome any remarks the Commission is willing to offer.
We direct the following question specifically to Commissioner Morse, and welcome comment from Commissioners White and Waters as well:
Commissioner Morse, it is our understanding that communications exist in which our CAO represented his engagement with your office as limited to pointing out a property listing — and characterized himself as otherwise uninvolved in any substantive capacity in bringing this project to Laurel. If you are willing to provide any context around the nature of those communications — publicly or privately — the Laurel community would be grateful. We also welcome remarks from any member of the Commission regarding the conduct of city leadership throughout this process.
Protective Zoning — The County's Position and Our Unanswered Request
On February 24, 2026, Laurel C.A.R.E.D. submitted a formal written request to the Yellowstone County Board of Commissioners — along with the Laurel City Council and the Office of the Mayor — requesting that the Commission adopt a companion interim zoning regulation under MCA 76-2-206, establishing a one-mile separation buffer between correctional and secure detention facilities and schools, parks, residential zones, churches, and licensed daycares. That request was detailed, legally grounded, and submitted over two weeks ago. We have received no response from this Commission.
We are asking directly: does the Yellowstone County Commission intend to act on that request?
Beyond that, we want to understand what the Commission's role would be in each of the scenarios now before this community. If the City of Laurel adopts a moratorium on annexation or an emergency ordinance, will the county adopt a companion interim zoning regulation as provided under MCA 76-2-206 — ensuring that the protective buffer cannot be circumvented by siting the facility just outside city limits? If the state applies for annexation and the City of Laurel denies it, what is the county's position? Does the Commission intend to stand with the residents of Laurel and Yellowstone County, or does it intend to facilitate a path forward for this project against the expressed will of the community?
We want to be straightforward about where we stand: the past several months have not given the residents of Laurel reason for confidence that the officials elected to represent them will do so when it matters. We have been blindsided by our own city leadership. We have submitted formal requests and received silence. We are not asking for reassurance. We are asking for a public commitment — and we are asking for it on the record, at this town hall, in front of the community you serve.
Questions for the Q&A Panel
We encourage each Commissioner to come prepared with direct questions for Governor Gianforte, Director Villa, and Director Brereton. The structured Q&A panel is an opportunity for county leadership to put questions on the record — on behalf of your constituents — to the state officials whose decisions have brought us to this point.
2. Yellowstone County Jail
We are asking the Commission to provide — or commit to providing — a comprehensive report on the Yellowstone County Jail: its history, current conditions, any documented operational or financial issues, and how it is funded. It is our understanding that Stillwater and Carbon Counties currently house inmates at the Yellowstone County Jail because they do not operate their own facilities. We want to know whether those counties are contributing proportionally to the costs of operating the current facility and what the plan is going forward.
Specifically:
- Is a new jail facility currently being planned, and is this expected to appear on the November ballot?
- What is the projected cost, and what will it mean for Yellowstone County taxpayers?
- Will this be structured as a shared or tri-county facility? If so, will financial and operational responsibilities be distributed equitably among all participating counties and their residents?
- How does the current facility compare to what is being proposed — and can the Commission provide a side-by-side overview of what will change, what will improve, and what residents can expect?
If a full report cannot be presented at the town hall, we ask that the Commission commit to making this information available to the public in a format that is accessible after the event.
3. Data Centers
We are aware that data center development is being discussed for locations in and around the region, and that some proposed sites may affect resources available to Yellowstone County residents. We ask whether the Commission is aware of constituent concerns on this issue and whether it is something the Commission is actively monitoring or researching. We recognize this topic may be early in its development, and a brief statement of awareness and intent from the Commission would be meaningful to residents who are paying attention.
Requested Participation
We are formally requesting that each Commissioner come prepared to deliver a presentation or remarks that directly address the questions outlined in this invitation. We recognize that sitting on a Q&A panel alongside state officials may not be the appropriate format for county leadership, and we want to offer a structure that works. A prepared presentation — addressing the community's questions on the forensic facility, the county jail, and the other topics raised here — is the format we are requesting as the primary mode of participation.
In addition, we are extending a standing invitation for each Commissioner to participate in the structured Q&A panel as questioners — not respondents. The opportunity to put direct questions to Governor Gianforte, Director Villa, and Director Brereton on the record, in front of the community you serve, is one we hope you will take seriously and come prepared to use.
We understand that schedules are demanding and that coordination among three commissioners takes planning. To make participation as straightforward as possible, we are flexible on format:
- All three Commissioners may present together as a unified panel or individually
- Commissioners may divide topics among themselves based on area of expertise or familiarity
What is not acceptable to this community is silence. The people of Laurel have asked the right questions through the right channels, and they have been met with deflection, delay, and inadequate responses at every turn. County leadership has both the standing and the responsibility to show up. We are asking you to do that.
If attendance is genuinely impossible for scheduling reasons, we ask that you contact us directly and promptly so that we can work together to find a solution — not a substitute.
Response Deadlines
Please respond by end of business Tuesday, March 10, 2026 to confirm attendance and in what capacity you plan to participate.
For planning purposes, we ask that you provide the following no later than end of business Thursday, March 12, 2026:
- The expected length of your presentation or remarks
- Any presentation accommodations needed (e.g., screen display, slideshow, audio)
- Any scheduling constraints — if there is a specific window during the evening that works best for you or that you require, please let us know so we can do our best to accommodate
- Any supplementary materials you intend to make available to community members
We want this evening to work well for everyone involved. Having this information in advance allows us to plan thoughtfully and ensure your time is well spent.
Laurel C.A.R.E.D.
Community Advocates for Responsible Economic Development
Laurel, Montana
connect@laurelcared.com | (406) 272-3707 | laurelcared.com